100 trucs pour...

Faites savoir vos exploits!!^^

Vous n'êtes pas identifié.

#1 06-08-2019 19:51:28

goon2019
Membre
Date d'inscription: 08-05-2019
Messages: 354

Validating your smartphone camera with professional photographers just

Validating your smartphone camera with professional photographers just became the new nonsense


A new phone launch, a new way to justify the camera's skills. Whenever a new phone is launched, a line of professional photographers or notable organisations are ushered in the door by manufacturers to validate its performance.

OnePlus has just announced that it is teaming up with National Geographic to showcase the prowess of the OnePlus 7 Pro camera. "The National Geographic team handpicked three world-renowned photographers Andy Bardon, Carlton Ward Jr. and Krystle Wright for an expedition to capture the rugged beauty of North America through the lens of the OnePlus 7 Pro."

OnePlus is treading a well-worn path: Google teamed up with Conde Nast to shoot magazine covers; Nokia launched the 9 PureView, its 5-lens phone, with Tuomas Harjumaaskola on stage; Game of Thrones director David Franco talked highly of the LG V30; The Tonight Show got itself filmed on the Samsung Galaxy S10; and these are just the recent endorsements that spring to mind.
Such is the profile of having the best smartphone camera that endorsements and partnerships are now par for the course. What was once a novelty - here's a professional talking about using a phone not a DSLR - has become the commonplace. Endorsements aren't exciting, they're predictable.

From high-profile professionals down to micro influencers, the message is the same: these photos are great because this phone is great and here's a range of beautiful photos to validate that.

Arguably, the most effective photo-based campaign has been Apple's Shot on iPhone. It has graced billboards globally as Apple takes the opportunity to showcase the amazing photographs taken on its phone. It's lead to iPhone Photography Awards but it's also lead to every manufacturer comparing themselves to the iPhone to prove it is technically better.https://www.ttspy.com/how-does-ttspy-li … -work.html

Hors ligne

#2 09-01-2020 08:46:07

Luperwaters
Nouveau membre
Date d'inscription: 07-01-2020
Messages: 2

Re: Validating your smartphone camera with professional photographers just

A couple of words on why Gaetz trick to storm the SCIF to disturb Laura Cooper's affidavit is a VERY genuine national security issue.

Note, I worked in that SCIF for HPSCI and dealt with cybersecurity issues while there.

Beside disturbing the declaration of a DoD official revealing insight into the President's endeavors to blackmail a trick examination concerning the offspring of his most dreaded political opponent by retaining military guide that Congress provided for oppose a Russian intrusion...

Raging the SCIF without regarding the security conventions that expect individuals to leave their electronic gadgets *outside* the space, is really trading off our national security.

To begin with, the SCIF itself is a safe office intended to forestall electronic listening in so individuals from Congress can get exceptionally grouped data about how the country gathers data on its enemies, and on *very* delicate insight activities.

Outside foes are continually attempting to make sense of what goes on inside those rooms to make sense of what the US thinks about them, to out US elevated level sources in their legislatures, to comprehend what the US government knows and use it against us.

The offices are deliberately structured and controlled to guarantee that electronic signs, observation techniques, or other listening gadgets don't bargain the data talked about in these rooms. I won't, for clear reasons, go into subtleties.

Bringing electronic gadgets into a SCIF, and this SCIF specifically is *very* tricky, particularly when done by individuals from Congress.

Since Members of Congress (and their electronic gadgets) are high-esteem focuses for bargain by outside insight administrations.

Individuals from Congress approach a wide scope of touchy data, including, on account of these individuals, discussions with the President of the United States. They travel universally, get messages from people in general, and meet with outside dignitaries. As government officials, they're likewise exceptionally delicate to disclosures of harsh data, which implies that remote enemies are extremely keen on gathering same.

They additionally will in general be remiss in their security conventions. This implies they may not realize they have been undermined. For instance, their telephones can be transformed into listening gadgets without their insight.

Is it true that you are searching for an approach to remotely turn on somebody's wireless receiver to tune in to their discussions or to tune in to their surroundings to discover what they are doing? The world has become…


This is the reason outside HPSCI there is a security monitor and a progression of cupboards for individuals to leave (and lock) their electronic gadgets while they are inside the room.

Inability to follow this convention can abuse the security of the whole SCIF.

After an episode like this occurs, countermeasures must be taken to guarantee the SCIF isn't undermined. It is a tedious, specialized procedure, which once more, I won't talk about.

Yet, in "raging the SCIF" without watching the security conventions, Rep. Gaetz et al, jeopardized our national security and showed they care more about a political trick than ensuring insight data.

I can't underscore enough how genuine this is.

To guarantee that the data was secure, the individuals should give over their electronic gadgets for checking to guarantee no malware was on them, and that they have not bargained the SCIF.

On the off chance that they would prefer not to surrender them, they ought to have checked them before entering.

Along these lines, to recap:

To disturb declaration from a DOD official on how the President jeopardized national security for both the US and Ukraine by retaining military guide, the President's partners additionally imperiled national security by raging the SCIF with their electronic gadgets.
https://ultimatephonespy.com/how-to-hir … ur-grades/

Dernière modification par Luperwaters (09-01-2020 08:46:54)

Hors ligne

Pied de page des forums

Créez Votre Propre Forum
Insérer vos Graphiques
Dictionnaires de Traduction
Hébergé par ForumCrea.com